Hi, On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 10:44 +0000, linuxsupport wrote: > OK, Can I make the swap partition of 500G? >
Yes, no problem! > I also want to confirm if using 500G swap partition for cache is good? > or spiting is needed? It sounds fine, but if a singl disk is up to the task (in terms of IOps), I'm not sure about. But here is imho no need in splitting it up in smaller partitions. Wido > > Aniruddh > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Wido den Hollander <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hi, > > I would use malloc: -s malloc,200G > > Then create a SWAP partition of 300GB on your 500GB disk and > add it as > SWAP. > > The kernel will then take care of the rest. > > Wido > > > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 09:59 +0000, linuxsupport wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am new to Varnish, I like the features, currently I am > testing it on > > development environment. > > > > We have 800+ web site so huge contents. I have 500Gb storage > and 24 GB > > memory on each server total 3 servers - Dual Quad Core Xeon. > > > > Can I use 20 GB of memory and 500 GB of disk as cache > storage? (ie. -s > > malloc,20G -s file,/lv2/v_cache/varnish_storage.bin > > Does Both memory and file storage work together? > > > > Is it good idea to have single file of 500GB for cache? or > should I > > split it as 500/3? ( In know Varnish does not pre allocate > the space). > > > > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > > varnish-misc mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > > _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
