On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Tollef Fog Heen < [email protected]> wrote:
> ]] Kristian Lyngstol > > | Personally, I'm leaning towards keeping the curent behavior, but it's a > | topic of frequent debate. It's very common to distinguish between > | web-clients and the reverse proxy - ideally we'd want our own set of > | headers... > > This sounds very much like what Surrogate-Control was designed for. Not > that it has seen much uptake, though. > > Wow, I wish I had known about Surrogate-Control before inventing X-Cache-Alternate for internal use in my organization. It would probably catch on if Varnish was the reference implementation. > -- > Tollef Fog Heen > Varnish Software > t: +47 21 98 92 64 > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > -- Jacob Elder @jelder (646) 535-3379
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
