Ok, very good statement - normally I know the override mechanism used by
the custom VCL.
Nevertheless my last email was incorrect - sorry for that.
But: What happens when you include a vcl_recv INSIDE another vcl_recv
subroutine?
This is what Frank did.
Stefan
--
http://dmsp.de
Am 16.12.2010 17:59, schrieb Per Buer:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Stefan Pommerening <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
of couse you only need one single vcl_recv subroutine. This
applies to all vcl subroutines.
I usually start with grabbing the default vcl and then add
everything I need to the existing (default) subroutines.
If you use the include statement you have to keep in mind that
inclusion is a textual
substitution - therefore no repeated definition of vcl_recv (or
even other subroutines)
is allowed.
Actually, multiple definitions of the same subroutine is allowed. They
are then concatenated, the flow being terminated only by the return
statements. This is how the default VCL get overridden by your custom
VCL.
There is a good example in the man vcl. Of course, this might get very
confusing when you have multiple vcl_recv subroutines spread over
several included files. Caution advised. :-)
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
