On 20 March 2011 21:43, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote:
> In message <[email protected]>, 
> Jona
> than Matthews writes:
>
>>just to know if there's anything
>>underlying the VCL at any specific points in the route through the
>>standard subroutines that would make being reentrant more complex to
>>deal with than solely making sure the algorithm is reentrant.  If that
>>makes sense :-)
>
> As long as you take care of the usual stuff, (static/global variables
> etc) there shouldn't be any issues.

Many thanks.

Jonathan
-- 
Jonathan Matthews
London, UK
http://www.jpluscplusm.com/contact.html

_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Reply via email to