Please do not overlook the object of the email which is actually ³Varnish child killed².
For the explanation of the hitratio: some tests are running and half of the misses are requests with cachekillers on purpose. Would anybody please help on understanding why this child process get killed ? Le 21/04/11 19:41, « Simon Lyall » a écrit : > On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Jean-Francois Laurens wrote: >> > 2. hitratio >> > My hit ratio is pretty low around 50%. >> > It used to be around 70% with the version 2.0.6 and dropped down to 50%. >> > I can¹t explain it as what was changed was only : >> > In vcl_fetch, replace obj by beresp >> > Replace calls to pass or deliver by return(deliver) or return(pass) > > Is this for http://www.tsr.ch/ ? > > If your hit ratio is 60% with a million objects then something is very > wrong. You have enough images there you should be well over 90% hits. > > Run "varnishlog -b" > > and see what your cache misses are ( or do look in your backend logs ). > > > Jean-Francois Laurens > Ingénieur Système Unix > Resources et Développement > Secteur Backend > RTS - Radio Télévision Suisse > Quai Ernest-Ansermet 20 > Case postale 234 > CH - 1211 Genève 8 > T +41 (0)58 236 81 63 >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
