Ah, it looks like I should be 'pass'ing POSTs, not 'pipe'ing them. This
makes them show up in the log.
Is this the recommended code
(http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/15/using-varnish-so-news-doesnt-break-your-server/)?
# Pass any requests that Varnish does not understand straight to
the back end.
if (req.request != "GET" && req.request != "HEAD" &&
req.request != "PUT" && req.request != "POST" &&
req.request != "TRACE" && req.request != "OPTIONS" &&
req.request != "DELETE") {
return(pipe);
} /* Non-RFC2616 or CONNECT which is weird. */
# Pass anything other than GET and HEAD directly.
if (req.request != "GET" && req.request != "HEAD") {
return(pass); /* We deal only with GET and HEAD by default */
}
Chris
On 2011/05/04 16:55, Chris Hecker wrote:
I couldn't figure out why POSTs weren't showing up in my varnish logs,
but from looking at the source, it looks like varnishncsa is hard coded
to ignore "pipe"? The code is slightly different between 2.0.6 (sorry,
I'm on an old version) and current, but both look like they toast the
current logline if the session close is a "pipe" or "error" without a
flag check to keep the txn.
My VCL pipes POSTs, as do most, I assume. Is there any way to get these
into the log short of modifing the source?
Thanks,
Chris
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
