On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Jonathan Matthews <[email protected] > wrote:
> So, coming back to the initial naive implementation, it looks like it > could be correct. But what have I missed? There's got to be some > complication to explain why this (or something like it) isn't in the > default VCL - was a decision taken not to adhere to section 13.10 of > RFC2616 at some point in the past? > We won't do this because it would totally break if you have more then one Varnish servers. It's the backend job to notify the caches when the content actually changes. -- Per Buer, CEO Phone: +47 21 98 92 61 / Mobile: +47 958 39 117 / Skype: per.buer *Varnish makes websites fly!* Whitepapers <http://www.varnish-software.com/whitepapers> | Video<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7t2Sp174eI> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/varnishsoftware>
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
