And a screenshot of varnishstat and varnishhist http://dl.dropbox.com/u/866639/varnish-3.0-comp.png http://dl.dropbox.com/u/866639/varnishhist-3.0-comp.png
Varnishist seems to indicate that it's a bit slower (The violet terminal is the 3.0-beta1) It also seems like it does not write it's fqdn in the top right corner anymore ;-) Den 30. mai 2011 kl. 13:03 skrev Audun Ytterdal <[email protected]>: > Ok. I've been running 3.0-beta1 over the weekend on one of our 4 main > varnishes. > > The following (ugly and very long) url compares a 2.1 against the new > 3.0 , seems to be behaving almost identical on moderate traffic > > http://munin.vgnett.no/naveed/#::int.vgnett.no::batista.int.vgnett.no:quinn.int.vgnett.no::acpi:bonding_err_bond0:cpu:df:df_inode:diskstats_iops:diskstats_latency:diskstats_throughput:diskstats_utilization:entropy:forks:fw_packets:http_loadtime:if_bond0:if_err_bond0:if_err_eth0:if_err_eth1:if_eth0:if_eth1:interrupts:iostat:iostat_ios:irqstats:load:memory:netstat:ntp_kernel_err:ntp_kernel_pll_freq:ntp_kernel_pll_off:ntp_offset:open_files:open_inodes:postfix_mailqueue:postfix_mailvolume:proc_pri:processes:sendmail_mailqueue:sendmail_mailstats:sendmail_mailtraffic:swap:threads:uptime:users:varnish_backend_traffic:varnish_expunge:varnish_hit_rate:varnish_memory_usage:varnish_objects:varnish_request_rate:varnish_threads:varnish_transfer_rates:varnish_uptime:vmstat:yum > > > Quinn has 3.0 batista has 2.1.5 > > Did the following changes to the vcl: > > in vcl_fetch: > > esi; -> set beresp.do_esi = true; > > return(pass); -> return(hit_for_pass); > > in vcl_hash > > set req.hash += req.http.hash-input; -> hash_data(req.http.hash-input); > > in vcl_error > > explicit add + to concatinate strings > > I find it a bit confusing that esi goes from a functional way of calling > it to a "setting variable/paramter"-way while req.hash goes in the > opposite direction from variable to functional way of calling it. Any > clearifying thoughts about that? > > On 2011-05-18 22:19, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It's me, your Varnish software developer, got a minute ? >> >> Cool, I'll make it really brief: >> >> As you may, or may not, have noticed, we have pushed out a Varnish >> 3.0 Beta1 release: >> >> http://www.varnish-cache.org/releases/varnish-cache-3.0-beta1 >> >> The major news are two features: >> >> GZIP/GUNZIP support, with or without ESI. >> >> Streaming PASS and FETCH support. >> >> I have also added, undoubtedly, some bugs, and this is where you >> come into the picture: >> >> My website gets 75 hits an hour, but I am pretty sure you have a >> website that takes more traffic than that, why else would you be >> on the Varnish announce mailing list ? >> >> So if you could find a couple of hours to test out Varnish 3.0 and >> report back to me how it goes, I would really appreciate it. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Poul-Henning >> >> -- >> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 >> [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 >> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe >> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by >> incompetence. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> varnish-announce mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-announce >> > > > -- > Audun Ytterdal > Driftsjef > VG Multimedia > tlf 92402277 > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
