Hello,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Jonathan Matthews <[email protected]>wrote: > On 25 March 2012 05:15, Ryan Chan <[email protected]> wrote:Your > responses are probably being cached because of the default > default_ttl setting, which you'll find detailed a little way down > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/3.0/reference/varnishd.html#run-time-parameters > . > > 1. I am wondering why `default_ttl of 120s is a good thing`, if the backend don't specify the ttl, shouldn't just pass it and not cache it would be the safest option? Hard coding 120s sound evil to me. 2. I am using 2.1, so sound like hard coding the ttl is the best choice then? Thanks again.
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
