On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:50:34AM +0200, Per Buer wrote: > > > (..) > > Half an hour later, the total resident memory is about 3.7 G. It's 3 > > times more than the configured size. > > This is a know weakness. DocWilco has provided a patch that I think is is > accepted in master. Hopefully it will be out in a future release. I'm > guessing it should not be to hard to backport the patch if you need to.
I don't believe that's what's at play here. I think it's a case of TTL below the shortlived parameter, and ending up in the Transient store, which is unbounded by default. Also, remember that you're configuring the size of the store, not the size of varnishd. There will be some overhead for threads and housekeeping. -- Andreas _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
