hello,
On 2012/05/09 3:11 PM, Sparsh Gupta wrote:
By efficient do you also mean fast? Unfortunately the only thing I
care is response times out of these boxes. I am happy to get more RAM
if needed but got to have best possible performance/response times out
of them (both both Hits, misses and passed queries). Are you sure file
will be better than malloc + swap as far as speed / response times are
concerned
with the same hw, if the cache does not fit in the physical memory,
'file' is better than malloc+swap.
of course with 'file' your operating system will also use the physical
ram as cache of the disk.
if you can buy memory enough to fit all the cache in ram, than it's the
best performance configuration (using malloc, of course for the
storage), as ram is better than any disk (even ssd) for quick response
time and transfer rate.
--
bye,
emilio
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
