Hi On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Richard Zuidhof <[email protected]> wrote:
> Due to a bug in 3.0.0 or 3.0.1 we had to switch back to file storage > instead of malloc last summer. Until now I had not bothered to change it > back after upgrading to 3.0.2 because I thought the increase in efficiency > would not matter too much for a relatively small server. To my surprise > there was an unexpected side effect. After I switched the config from 2G > file to 1500M malloc the number of objects in the Varnish cache increased > from 58000 to 115000. Less memory, more objects.Is this by design? Can > anyone explain this? > -sfile put objects at 4k boundaries if I recall correctly. If you have many small objects the overhead is significant. -- Per Buer Phone: +47 21 98 92 61 / Mobile: +47 958 39 117 / Skype: per.buer *Varnish makes websites fly!* Whitepapers <http://www.varnish-software.com/whitepapers> | Video<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7t2Sp174eI> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/varnishsoftware>
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
