On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:22 PM, david raistrick <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Per Buer wrote: > > The implementation of "stats" wasn't really up to scratch and was ditched >> in >> Varnish 3.0. However, wrapping "varnishstat -1 -x" in a tiny CGI service >> is >> probably a 15 minute job. >> > > What? really? wtf? stats is gone from the management interface? > > Damn good thing we never updated to 3.0...and sounds like we never will. :( > There isn't much work going into maintaining the 2.1 branch so I would not recommend, at least not without paying a bit of attention. Network services absolutely -must- provide network interfaces for > statistics polling! IMPO. > I'm not sure I agree. Binding varnishstat to a TCP port through xinetd or another inetd variant is trivial. Also, if you insist on having the stats command "in line" you could use the varnish agent ( https://github.com/varnish/varnish-agent) which also ads a couple of other commands into the protocol. -- Per Buer Phone: +47 21 98 92 61 / Mobile: +47 958 39 117 / Skype: per.buer *Varnish makes websites fly!* Whitepapers <http://www.varnish-software.com/whitepapers> | Video<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7t2Sp174eI> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/varnishsoftware>
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
