On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Baptiste <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not chaining Varnish with HAProxy?
That basically substitutes HAProxy for BIND, with the added disadvantage of making an extra socket copy of every byte that is proxied. Nothing that takes a static configuration and reloads works in an environment where the configuration changes at intervals measured in (sometimes fractions of) seconds. Our backend routing decisions really have to be done from C++, which is why we use Squid now and why I was looking at doing a varnish+vmod solution. But I guess it isn't possible yet. :( We did solve the immediate problem (IPv6 support) by upgrading squid. It still doesn't use SMP properly, but that's less of an issue. I will keep checking from time to time as I think varnish is great and would like to see us give it a real shot. Thanks! _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
