Rafał Radecki napisał(a): > I cannot switch from active/passive to active/active at the moment. >
Hi Rafał, in such a situation you may try to use varnishreplay to warm up second node before first one goes down. You may consider using first one as a temporary backend if real backend is far or slow. -- Jakub Słociński > 2013/2/18 Sascha Ottolski <[email protected]>: > > Am Montag, 18. Februar 2013, 13:37:46 schrieb Rafał Radecki: > >> Hi all. > >> > >> I have a two node pacemaker cluster. If primary node goes down then > >> secondary node takes its role. > >> I use varnish on both nodes. When I switch to the secondary node the > >> cache needs to be regenerated (as expected). Is there a way to > >> replicate varnish cache between two servers? Something like conntrackd > >> for iptables? > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Rafal Radecki. > > > > I would recommend an active/active setup instead. Put a loadbalancer in > > front, and let it distribute the request to both nodes. If one goes > > down, the other is obviously warm. No special "tricks" required, and you > > make better use of you're hardware when both nodes are fine. > > > > Cheers > > > > Sascha > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > varnish-misc mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
