I understand that. Let me rephrase that question. When using file storage, am I correct in assuming, that the overhead uses additional space on the volume that the file itself is on?
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Wood <[email protected]> wrote: > Ultimately the amount of overhead space needed is determined by the number > of objects you have. The overhead is about 1k per object. You can read more > at *Sizing Your > Cache*<https://www.varnish-cache.org/docs/3.0/tutorial/sizing_your_cache.html>on > the varnish doc. > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Sean Allen > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I know when using malloc storage, that we end up based on our object >> size, about another 100% percent memory to store additional booking info. >> So where we have a >> >> -s malloc, 6g >> >> We need a total of 12g available to the OS. >> >> If I switch to >> >> -s file, 10g >> >> Do I need 20g of HD space available on that drive? >> I'm unclear how the issues with malloc map to file storage backend. >> For example, why does file default to 50% sizing of the volume? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> varnish-misc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >> > > -- Ce n'est pas une signature
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
