Are there any exceptions to the "2 is best" rule for this? I'm asking out of curiosity. It seems strange to me that Varnish would even provide the option to change it if any other value is detrimental to performance.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Per Buer <[email protected]> wrote: > That is correct. We haven't been able to see any increase in performance > when the number of pools is increased above 2. > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Rangel, Raul <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I think someone recently commented that 2 thread pools is the ideal >> value. Anymore and you don’t see a performance increase.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Raul**** >> >> ** ** >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *[email protected] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 06, 2013 2:23 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* varnish 3 - thread_pools**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Hi,**** >> >> **** >> >> By the book, the thread_pools should be 2. However the server is >> multi-processed(8 cpus) and can handle more thread_pools.**** >> >> This server handles more than 5000 requests/sec. **** >> >> **** >> >> Is it a good ideia increasing the thread_pools to 8 and decreasing the >> thread_pool_max?**** >> >> **** >> >> regards,**** >> >> **** >> >> Leandro Sano**** >> >> _______________________________________________ >> varnish-misc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >> > > > > -- > <http://www.varnish-software.com/> *Per Buer* > CEO | Varnish Software AS > Phone: +47 958 39 117 | Skype: per.buer > We Make Websites Fly! > > Winner of the Red Herring Top 100 Europe Award 2013 > > > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
