On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 03:12 -0400, Gabriel Filion wrote: > On 04/09/14 01:20 AM, Kristian Grønfeldt Sørensen wrote: > > Wouldn't this indicate a bug in the Debian packaging ? Shouldn't the > > varnish 3.0.5 package depend on the libvarnishapi package in version > > 3.0.5, to prevent stuff like this from happening? > > there's already a dependency from the varnish package to libvarnishapi1: > > dep: libvarnishapi1 (>= 3.0.0) > shared libraries for Varnish > > (c.f. https://packages.debian.org/squeeze-backports/varnish ) > > > but that's why it didn't upgrade automatically when you bumped version > to squeeze-backports: then it means the dependency is not high enough, > it should be >= 3.0.5
Sorry if I was unclear. The "Debian packaging" I was referring to above is not the packaging done by Debian in squeeze-backports, since I'm using the packages from repo.varnish-cache.org, but rather the packaging process that produces Debian packages for repo.varnish-cache.org. > you should report a bug on the debian package to describe your issue and > the fix you've used, and suggest to update the dependency on the package. > I was actually trying to find out if this is considered a bug in varnish-cache.org context, and if it makes sense to file a Varnish trac ticket for this. BR Kristian _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
