> > Don't worry about it. The client did a conditional request and Varnish > just confirmed that the content they have is valid. Hence no need to > retransmit the content (note the zero length body).
Thanks for that feedback, Per! Makes perfect sense. Best regards, Tim On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Per Buer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tim, > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Tim Dunphy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey varnish folks, >> >> >> It's been brought to my attention at the company that I work for that >> entries with '304' status in them keep turning up in the varnish log >> (/var/log/varnish.log). >> >> Such as what you see here: (..) >> > > Don't worry about it. The client did a conditional request and Varnish > just confirmed that the content they have is valid. Hence no need to > retransmit the content (note the zero length body). > > Per. > > -- > *Per Buer* > CTO | Varnish Software AS > Cell: +47 95839117 > We Make Websites Fly! > www.varnish-software.com > [image: Register now] > <http://info.varnish-software.com/varnish-summits-autumn-2014-registration> > -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
