Why wouldn't it be cached? Sorry but I'm not getting the problem here. -- Guillaume Quintard
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:56 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but the result were cached and can't understand why. While it's > cached on port 80 where the varnish is, opening the page with :8080 was ok > (on the apache side). Any other suggestions? > > > On 12/14/2015 07:04 PM, Guillaume Quintard wrote: > >> Server: Apache >> > 16 TxHeader c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 >> > 16 TxHeader c Content-Length: 0 >> > 16 TxHeader c Accept-Ranges: by >> > >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
