Thank you very much for this precious information. I will use 64 GB malloc.
Regards, Alexandre. On 12/01/16 14:31, Jason Price wrote:
Yes. More than 64 gb malloc size works fine. I was using 150gb with no issue. Fair warning through: varnish will use more ram than the malloc size. That really is just the total size of all cached objects. There's about 1k of overhead per object to deal with. So the Resident Set Size will probably be higher than your malloc size. (Also: if you have very short lived objects (10 seconds by default) that doesn't accrue into the 'malloc' size either... they stack in an unbounded 'transient' storage by default. I got bitten by caching errors for 5 seconds with this default)
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
