Ignore the vsz column. It is effectively worthless as a measure. That RSS however... if that grows to more than 150% of the 4G number, then you might have to look at your config more closely.
Why 150%? because there's overhead for each cached object (around 1k per) and there's other stuff which impacts things as well. -Jason On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Tobias Eichelbrönner < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > thanks for the reply. > > > ps -eo pid,user,vsz,rss,%cpu,%mem,cmd | egrep ... > > nobody 7284032 3590708 5.2 5.4 /usr/sbin/varnishd -P > /var/run/varnishd.pid -a :80 -T localhost:6082 -f > /etc/varnish/default.vcl -S /etc/varnish/secret -s > file,/var/lib/varnish/varnish_storage.bin,4G > > The stats shown here are lower than reported in my last mail as I had to > restart varnish since than. But 8 GB of virtual RAM also seem to be to > high for a system with 4GB file storage and does not match anything I > see in varnishtat output. > > Sincerely, > > Tobias > > -- > LAMP solutions GmbH > Gostenhofer Hauptstrasse 35 > 90443 Nuernberg > > Amtsgericht Nuernberg: HRB 22366 > Geschaeftsfuehrer: Heiko Schubert > > Es gelten unsere allgemeinen Geschaeftsbedingungen. > http://www.lamp-solutions.de/agb/ > > Telefon : 0911 / 376 516 0 > Fax : 0911 / 376 516 11 > E-Mail : [email protected] > Web : www.lamp-solutions.de > Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/LAMPsolutions > Twitter : http://twitter.com/#!/lampsolutions > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
