Hi Poul, the messages i've got were Dec 31 23:59:59 lin-varnish kernel: Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC and Jan 1 00:00:02 lin-varnish ntpd[951]: 0.0.0.0 061b 0b leap_event
I'm not sure how the CentOS handled leapsecond... Regards Yiannis 2017-01-01 13:02 GMT+02:00 Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]>: > -------- > In message <CAMbCpVq4KFEkfbYjVEqEhaJB+PbZWmdv04-z8w2PpvnXkfazCQ@ > mail.gmail.com>, Yiannis Karayi > annidis writes: > > >Dec 31 23:59:59 lin-varnish kernel: Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 > >UTC > >Dec 31 23:59:59 lin-varnish systemd: Time has been changed > >Dec 31 23:59:59 lin-varnish kernel: varnishd[18512]: segfault at 0 ip > >0000000000433829 sp 00007fd7c7d1e170 error 4 in varnishd[400000+95000] > > Do you know how this particular system handled leapseconds ? > > (ie: did it step the clock, did it use the ntp_adjtime(STA_INS) or dit it > slew it ?) > > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
