On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Nigel Peck <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for this, great to have the detailed info. So it looks like the most > efficient solution is going to be to only "do_gzip" uncacheable responses if > the client supports it, which means also implementing (and modifying) the > builtin code in my VCL, and not flowing through to it. Got it, thanks.
Maybe I should start a section on gzip tuning in the docs. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
