Hello, Your best best is indeed to reduce the TTL to store less object, or just to reduce the storage size
-- Guillaume Quintard On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Reinis Rozitis <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > is there a way to limit maximum cached object count in Varnish or better > handle OOM situation? > > I use only file backend storage (on SSDs) and the nodes have 32Gb ram. > While the maximum object count was previously limited by the backend > storage now after upgrading the ssd capacity varnish triggers OOM killer > (no swap on the instance) and restarts after reaching 35M objects which > kind of makes sense considering the 1Kb per object overhead. > > So what would be the best way to handle it (besides adding more ram)? > Based on average object size just limit the backend storage size so no > more than ~30M objects fit / tweak the TTL so older objects get evicted > sooner / add swap? > > > rr > > > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
