> 2. that just hasn't been implemented yet, if I'm not mistaken (that would be the softban feature)
-- Guillaume Quintard On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Serhii Korobov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > I have question about "softban feature". I did not find information about > that, except this message https://varnish-cache.org/ > lists/pipermail/varnish-dev/2014-May/007836.html > > I suppose this feature has not implemented yet. Am I right? > > Thanks! > > 2018-07-23 22:56 GMT+03:00 Guillaume Quintard <guillaume@varnish-software. > com>: > >> Hi, >> >> 1. You already answer that one: you get a background fetch when obj.ttl >> <= 0 but obj.ttl + obj.grace > 0. >> >> 2. that just hasn't been implemented yet, if I'm not mistaken (that would >> be the softban feature) >> >> -- >> Guillaume Quintard >> >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Serhii Korobov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi developers of Varnish >>> >>> I read information about Varnish 4 release ( >>> https://varnish-cache.org/lists/pipermail/varnish-announce >>> /2014-April/000696.html ) and found there a new feature >>> http://prntscr.com/k8dgfk . I need an information about refreshing >>> expired cache in background. >>> >>> As I know from developer guide, fetching new object in background thread >>> is available only in Grace Mode - http://book.varnish-software >>> .com/4.0/chapters/Saving_a_Request.html#grace-mode when object's ttl >>> has expired but grace period is not over yet. >>> >>> Here are my questions: >>> 1. When and how can I use background cache refreshing? >>> 2. Why Grace Mode and cache invalidation via "ban" command doesn't work >>> together? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> varnish-misc mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
