Am Montag, den 25.05.2020, 22:38 +1000 schrieb Alex Wakefield: > Hey Dridi, > > Thanks for the reply. I originally thought that it might've been > transient storage as well however checking that shows that only 287MB > of storage has been allocated from it. Its allocated and released > 1.06TB though, is that perhaps the cause of the issue? > > SMA.s0.g_bytes shows the correct size of 23.99GB allocated which is > what I expect however a pmap of the varnish process shows 29977920K > used, 6GB over what was set.
Whats your /proc/meminfo output? -- Leon _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
