> > Did you try to increase thread_pool_max? > > > > Yes, we increased thread_pool_max and thread_pool_min after that issue. > For the moment all work fine.
FWIW, it's in the documentation of the threads_limited counter, which you (and Guillaume) didn't seem to notice (or remember) before I brought this up. Correct me if I'm wrong of course, but more importantly please let me know how we could improve the documentation if that was not enough. > We think about adjusting other params concerning threads like > thread_pool_reserve. > Did you have advise about that? If you already increased thread_pool_min, you mechanically increased the size of the reserve (5% of thread_pool_min by default) so I'd suggest you keep monitoring threads_limited and see whether you need more workers for your workload. Dridi _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@varnish-cache.org https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc