Ok, I was tricky:
!( this && that) = !this || !that
could have been a turn around of unallowed mixed && and || if
parenthesis were available :
[this && that || another] not allowed
[this && !( !that && !another)] allowed
Stupid idea anyway:
If parentheses were allowed, a syntax parser and _expression_ solver is
needed
[this && (that || another)], [(this && that) || another]
would be solved in two punctual different stages
so mixing && and || would not matter
It would probably solve single and double arguments operators too
So resolving [this && that || another] would just be a matter of
precedence and the ! operator would probably be available
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "vassalengine" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
