Also, the reason there are so many VASSAL forums spread out everywhere
is because there's no single forum which is doing it the right way.
I want to know that if I need to find bug discussions I can go to one
place and look under "Bug Discussion".  With the current system, there
is no facility to do so, it's a mess.

 

--- In [email protected], "Tim McCaron"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A typical Php board, common everywhere.
> 
>  
> 
> While I don't mind forums, I don't really see its value here.
> 
>  
> 
> What categories would you have? The more you have - the less used
the board
> is  (Ive seen many sparse boards due to category overkill)
> 
>  
> 
> As it stands now there are 3 mailing lists for vassal, this group,
devgroup
> and vaslmap group. Apart from those, there are several forums vassal
already
> has a section for - CSW, StrategyZone, Matrix. Not to mention all
the one
> off specific module sites, in game mail system etc..see a picture
emerging?
> We already have a very decentralized system for finding Vassal
information.
> Adding one more isn't going to help anymore - we have too many places to
> check now, unless you are advocating abandoning all those options
already
> available for users and channel them to one specific place.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of b5mith
> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 6:20 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [vassalengine] Re: why not message board? :P
> 
>  
> 
> As an example of a good open source forum, yes, I have to again
> mention Megamek :) Check out their forum, this is exactly what we
> need in my opinion:
> 
> http://www.mekwars. <http://www.mekwars.org/forum/> org/forum/
> 
> --- In vassalengine@ <mailto:vassalengine%40yahoogroups.com>
> yahoogroups.com, "admiralbarbossa"
> <admiralbarbossa@> wrote:
> >
> > Just wondering... I mean, I got 45 e-mails within the past 2 days with
> > postings here, don't you think a message board would be more
officiant?
> >
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to