Hi,

AH> True, the number and quality of the available XPCOM language bindings is
AH> rather poor. However, fixing a binding should not be overly hard, the
AH> interface is quite simple. However, C++ is usually an easier candidate
AH> for writing a VirtualBox GUI as you will also have to deal with things
AH> like pointers to video memory (could be handled in Python as well I guess).
In fact, PyXPCOM is quite functional but tied to Mozilla NSPR/XPCOM
infrastructure. I was considering it for fast prototyping DBUS-XPCOM
bridge but it appeared that C++ soultion is omewaht faster to write...

-- 
Best regards,
 Valentine                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_______________________________________________
vbox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev

Reply via email to