The Feburary "Linux Format" magizine has a cover story "Virtualize Now". It goes recommending VirtualBox due to the many features from vbox. However, it has one sentence saying VirtualBox is about 50% of KVM's performance. How could it be possible? considering the similar artichetures (both are using a kernel driver inside host OS). Is that the case if comparing vbox without enabling hardware VT to KVM (which works only on VT)? Any thoughts? Thanks, Huihong
_______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
