hm, then this is a BIG info for distribution packagers which prepare virtualbox binaries/packages for their distros, I think packagers from virtualbox team in Oracle should join effort with distribution packagers .... we should avoid duplicity work in this case
thanks On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Frank Mehnert <[email protected]> wrote: > Michal, > > On Tuesday 07 December 2010, Michal Šebeň wrote: >> 2010/12/7 Achim Hasenmüller <[email protected]>: >> does it also means that e.g. all builded rpms in >> http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/4.0.0_BETA1/ are pure OSS ? >> >> I asked because license is still marked as PUEL >> rpm -qp --qf="%{LICENSE}\n" >> VirtualBox-4.0-4.0.0_BETA1_68572_openSUSE113-1.x86_64.rpm >> VirtualBox Personal Use and Evaluation License (PUEL) > > thanks for this notification. This is indeed a bug and will be > fixed in 4.0 Beta 2. But the license file in /usr/share/doc/... > is GPLv2. > > Kind regards, > > Frank > -- > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Dr.-Ing. Frank Mehnert > Werkstrasse 24 Staff Engineer, VirtualBox > 71384 Weinstadt, Germany mailto:[email protected] > > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603 > > Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Rijnzathe 6, 3454PV De Meern, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven > > _______________________________________________ > vbox-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev > > _______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
