On Thursday 13 January 2011 22:59:24 François Revol wrote: >> Maybe it could be broken down into vbox-common, vbox-headless, vbox-gui or >> something ? That is quite common practice on debian it seems.
Frank Mehnert <frank.mehnert@...> wrote: > You might have noted that we currently provide VirtualBox packages for > more than 30 different Linux distributions (even currently 10 only for > different Ubuntu releases) so there is no "Ubuntu" package. I got the point that there is a high effort to maintain all the different releases. (lenny_amd64, lenny_i386, squeeze_amd64, squeeze_i386, hardy_amd64, hardy_i386, karmic_amd64, karmic_i386, lucid_amd64, lucid_i386, maverick_amd64, maverick_i386) Obvious the idea to split up the package(s) sounds best to me, there might be another option. What about have the qt, x and sdl as recommends and the current recommends as suggests? BR Dominik _______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
