>Today OS X in a VirtualBox VM is the very opposite of VRAM hungry. We >don't have any graphics driver for it, which means it runs using purely >the UEFI graphics support. To my knowledge this is limited to a single >screen. > >We're planning to do an OS X graphics driver (as part of an eventually >complete set of guest additions), but as there doesn't seem to be any >potential paying customers it can't get a high priority. Hi,
ahh ok, I'll take that into account. Well still, for what I'm doing VirtualBox is great. I looked at other VM's, and the best alternative I found was using Spice with Xen, but I could not find direct memory access in it like in VirtualBox, so that would introduce much latency.
_______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
