Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2014-12-18 at 07:19 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: >> VirtualBox-4.3.20-1.fc21.x86_64 >> >> I see VB installed into /etc/modules-load.d. These files should be installed >> into /usr/lib/modules-load.d instead. According to manpage: >> >> ''' >> Each configuration file shall be named in the style of program.conf. >> Files in /etc/ override files >> with the same name in /usr/lib/ and /run/. Files in /run/ override >> files >> with the same name in >> /usr/lib/. Packages should install their configuration files in >> /usr/lib/, files in /etc/ are >> reserved for the local administrator, who may use this logic to >> override >> the configuration files >> installed from vendor packages. >> >> If the administrator wants to disable a configuration file supplied by >> the vendor, the recommended >> way is to place a symlink to /dev/null in /etc/modules-load.d/ bearing >> the same filename. >> ''' > > Hi, I will see that, thanks to open the bug report on rpmfusion, but > what is the importance of that ? for what ? To prioritize this > > Best regards -Probably not a high priority. It would allow the systemd config files to work as intended by the man page. Also, should be a simple enough change.
- -- Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it _______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
