Not sure what you're referring to. Your driver specifically? Or the entire 
guest OS? In general, there is not known to be any significant performance 
difference between the chipsets either way. Specific devices might perform 
faster with ICH9 (e.g. xHCI with MSIs is faster than xHCI without) but the 
difference isn't huge. 

If it's your driver specifically then... well, why is it behaving so 
differently? Only you can find out. 

Most of the devices aren't "required" as far as VirtualBox is concerned, but 
there's only so far you can get without disk or network. 

FYI, in my VM, AHCI definitely isn't behind a bridge. It's at bus/dev/fn 
0:1f:02. 

- Michal 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: apallapo...@gmail.com 
To: vbox-dev@virtualbox.org 
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 2:52:49 AM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / 
Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna 
Subject: [vbox-dev] ICH9 devices 


Hello Experts, 


My "custom" driver execution takes long with ICH9 as compared to PIIX3, ~4X 
difference. Custom device is a pluggable device registered. 
Apart from 2 "ich9pcibridge" devices I don't see any thing else "new" in ICH9. 
With ICH9, AHCI is connected on other side of the bridge (on bus 2), while on 
PIIX3, it is on the root port. Could this be the reason for slowness ? 
I used same settings between the two chipsets, have disabled "audio" in both 
instances since I don't need them. Is there a way to reduce overall traffic ? 
I presume all current devices in ICH9 are required (?) but is there a way to 
improve performance ? I am not much bothered about other devices, apart from 
having functional chipset. 


Thanks.
_______________________________________________
vbox-dev mailing list
vbox-dev@virtualbox.org
https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev

Reply via email to