On 16-05-18 11:46 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Since you do that kind of testing, I can drop you VirtIO drivers for
Windows 7 guest, and see how far can we go
...?
(I hope it will work with Windows 2012, but no guarantees)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ncc0kzxrddwyick/VirtIO.iso?dl=0
Other news: I'm developing my own next-generation TCP/IP stack. Do you
know anyone who would like to discuss this with me? (I have a
presentation ready and documentation specs)
Thanks for your work,
-Technologov
18 Май 2016 г. 9:16 PM пользователь "Geoff Nordli" <geo...@gnaa.net
<mailto:geo...@gnaa.net>> написал:
Hi.
Really happy with the network performance boost with vbox5!!
Really 900Mbps over a virtualized network is pretty good.
One thing I notice that the outbound is slower than the inbound.
Any suggested tweak to get the same throughput?
The configuration:
Vbox 5.0.20
Virtual Machine: Windows 2012 R2 with the 82540EM network card.
Client: Windows 7 on physical hardware connected via 1Gbps switch.
Using the latest iperf tests, with default options.
Client -> VM 903Mbps
VM -> Client 572Mbps
Hi Alexey.
Do you see any difference between virtio and the intel card?
I can use the drivers from the redhat site:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Windows_Virtio_Drivers
It is going to be a bit before I actually try it out though.
At this point most of my clients are smaller and use an all-in-one
server so speed isn't really a big concern; especially if we can bridge
the gap between outbound and inbound connections. 900Mbps is more than
fast enough for the types of servers I deploy.
thanks,
Geoff
_______________________________________________
vbox-dev mailing list
vbox-dev@virtualbox.org
https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
