Just a small patch, which seems to make sense (at least to me). I got the idea
from an understandable misunderstanding:
https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=86126&p=410366#p410367
-------------------------------------
VBoxManage showvminfo "Debian9"
...
USB: disabled
EHCI: disabled
XHCI: enabled
...
User: I don't know why command "VBoxManage showvminfo "Debian9" " showed that
USB is disabled...
-------------------------------------
I can see that having USB labeled as "disabled" could confuse some users. The
patch modifies the output so that it's more in line with the VM settings, i.e.
both numeric USB, and the *HCI ones.
Socratis
Index: src/VBox/Frontends/VBoxManage/VBoxManageInfo.cpp
===================================================================
--- src/VBox/Frontends/VBoxManage/VBoxManageInfo.cpp (revision 70243)
+++ src/VBox/Frontends/VBoxManage/VBoxManageInfo.cpp (working copy)
@@ -1988,19 +1988,19 @@
}
if (details == VMINFO_MACHINEREADABLE)
- RTPrintf("usb=\"%s\"\n", fOhciEnabled ? "on" : "off");
+ RTPrintf("ohci=\"%s\"\n", fOhciEnabled ? "on" : "off");
else
- RTPrintf("USB: %s\n", fOhciEnabled ? "enabled" :
"disabled");
+ RTPrintf("USB 1.1 (OHCI): %s\n", fOhciEnabled ? "enabled" :
"disabled");
if (details == VMINFO_MACHINEREADABLE)
RTPrintf("ehci=\"%s\"\n", fEhciEnabled ? "on" : "off");
else
- RTPrintf("EHCI: %s\n", fEhciEnabled ? "enabled" :
"disabled");
+ RTPrintf("USB 2.0 (EHCI): %s\n", fEhciEnabled ? "enabled" :
"disabled");
if (details == VMINFO_MACHINEREADABLE)
RTPrintf("xhci=\"%s\"\n", fXhciEnabled ? "on" : "off");
else
- RTPrintf("XHCI: %s\n", fXhciEnabled ? "enabled" :
"disabled");
+ RTPrintf("USB 3.0 (xHCI): %s\n", fXhciEnabled ? "enabled" :
"disabled");
}
ComPtr<IUSBDeviceFilters> USBFlts;
_______________________________________________
vbox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
