On 05/20/2010 01:41 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Thursday 20 May 2010 20:01:36 JD wrote:
>    
>> On 05/20/2010 12:45 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
>>      
>>> On Thursday 20 May 2010 12:19:17 JD wrote:
>>>        
>>>> On 05/20/2010 06:59 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>>> On 05/19/2010 11:29 AM, Mario Lobo wrote:
>>>>>>              
>>>>>>> On Tuesday 18 May 2010 23:24:06 Mario Lobo wrote:
>>>>>>>                
>>>>>>>> Hi;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> First let me thank all the developers for their efforts with VBox.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've installed the recently announced 3.2.0 stable release but I see
>>>>>>>> that,
>>>>>>>> after installing its companion guest additions on a Win XP SP3
>>>>>>>> guest, VBoxService.exe hits 99% of CPU usage all the time!. I
>>>>>>>> doesn't even go down
>>>>>>>>      to 97 or 98. It stays fixed at 99% on the performance monitor.
>>>>>>>> After about
>>>>>>>>      15 minutes of the VM on (without doing anything on it), VBox
>>>>>>>> aborts the
>>>>>>>>      machine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The host also suffers with this. With the earlier GA (BETA1) and an
>>>>>>>> idle
>>>>>>>>      VM, Host CPU hovers around 8% (11% peaks). With the new GA and
>>>>>>>> idle VM, it
>>>>>>>>      sticks to 37% (40% peaks) CPU usage.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The same thing happened with VBoxGuestAdditions_3.2.0_BETA2/3 but
>>>>>>>> NOT with
>>>>>>>> VBoxGuestAdditions_3.2.0_BETA1 or any earlier GA!, with BETA1, VBox
>>>>>>>> works
>>>>>>>> perfectly, so I reverted back to it until this issue is cleared.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> System: FBSD 8-STABLE (updated weekly) amd64
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>                  
>>>>>>> Did anyone else on the list experience that?
>>>>>>>                
>>>>>> I just ran winxp 32 bit guest on FC12 host
>>>>>> using VB-3.2 release.
>>>>>> CPU load of both VB threads did not exceed 25%
>>>>>> (i.e. 50% total)
>>>>>> On my uniproc Athlon64 3200+, this is the norm,
>>>>>> for VB, and nothing new.
>>>>>>              
>>>>> Well, I must say that either the VB load on FreeBSD hosts is A LOT
>>>>> lighter (xp vm running and total host load=10%) or you do have a
>>>>> problem if you're hitting 50% load with only 1 VM running, although I
>>>>> have something going for me, which is a Phenom II 955 quad.
>>>>>
>>>>> But what I was referring to on my post was the load of VBoxService.exe
>>>>> INSIDE the xp guest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mario
>>>>>            
>>>> Well, I think things on FC12 are different perhaps. I dont know.
>>>> I am NOT running two VM's What I meant by BOTH threads is that
>>>> there is the VBox GUI thread which seems to be different from
>>>> the emulation thread. I am running only ONE VM.
>>>> Buth the two threads together consume 50% of CPU. The way the
>>>> Fedora scheduler appears to work, is that if you have other
>>>> threads that are also cpu hogs (as in my case, Firefox playing
>>>> some Youtube vids, I was seeing
>>>> VB1   25%
>>>> VB2   25%
>>>> FFox  35%
>>>>
>>>> Now after I killed Firefox, I checked again
>>>> and lo and behold, the CPU load of the two VBox
>>>> threads jumped to a total of 90-96%
>>>> which DOES make sense if you realize that when
>>>> no other thread wants to run, then the threads
>>>> that DO want to run (i.e. they are on the runq),
>>>> then they will be on the CPU.
>>>> This remained the case even after I reniced the
>>>> the two VBox threads to have lower priority than
>>>> the rest of the threads running in the system
>>>> (All had priority 20 and nice 0).
>>>> So I reniced the VB threads to +2, and that lowered
>>>> their priority to 22, but they still consumed 90-95%
>>>> of CPU, which means that most of the time no other
>>>> thread wanted to run (i.e no other thread was on the runq).
>>>>
>>>> Hope this helps a little.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> JD
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> --- ---
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> VBox-users-community mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community
>>>>          
>>> What version of Guest Additions did you install on your xp guest ?
>>>        
>> The ones that came with 3.2 release, and which are located in
>> /usr/share/virtualbox/VBoxGuestAdditions.iso
>>
>> Actually, all you have to do is click on
>> Devices->  Install Guest Additions
>>
>> and that will install the guest additions from above location.
>>
>>      
> Ok JD. Thanks for the instructions.
>
> The guest additions version you're using explains why your CPU is at 50% with
> just one VM !!.
>
> Now let me give you some too.
>
> Try this:
>
> Inside your guest XP, bring up the task monitor (right ctrl+del) and check out
> the CPU usage for the process with the highest percentage (90s%). If its not
> "System idle time", check out if it isn't VBoxService.exe.
>
> After that, mount and install guest additions from
> VBoxGuestAdditions_3.2.0_BETA1.iso, and you will see not only see your guest
> CPU usage, but also your host CPU usage reduced !!.
>
>    
Hello Mario,
Just to satisfy my curiosity, I uninstalled vbox 3.2 release,
and re-installed vbox 3.2 beta2 and monitored
load factors on both the guest and FC12 host.
Absolutely nothing different as far as load factors (cpu utilization)
are concerned.

Cheers,

JD

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
VBox-users-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community

Reply via email to