On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Hector Sanjuan <li...@convivencial.org> wrote: > Hello, > > yes you're right. This is not exactly right. I have corrected it or asked > for update where it proceeds. > > Live migration is supported, however if I remember well the destination host > had to be set up carefully to receive the VM, whereas with kvm it would be > as easy as issuing a virsh migrate command, although I might be wrong since > I haven't followed developments on this very closely. >
virsh ? huh ? I know, that virsh and libvirt did support VirtualBox a while back. (v3.2 ?). If you use it for KVM and friends, your team might take a look to improve libvirt's VirtualBox backend, so you could use it as the abstraction layer. We had similar analysis in the past for GNS3 projects to support multiple hypervisors, and here are the results: Evaluate Libvirt: http://redmine.gns3.net/issues/40 We rejected libvirt on the grounds, that it lacks UDP Tunnel support, but we can re-visit this idea few years down the road. -- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management. Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one command center Diagnose problems and improve visibility into emerging IT issues Automate, monitor and manage. Do more in less time with Central http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein12331_d2d _______________________________________________ VBox-users-community mailing list VBox-users-community@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe: mailto:vbox-users-community-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe
