I downloaded a demo, can play with it for two weeks. Its drivers will compile 
against linux kernel 2.6.18, NOT against 2.6.20. Vbox's did just fine on both 
but Parallels has network drivers and this stuff has changed radically for 
newer kernels.

UI looks very similar to ours. Very similar!

Some differences:
1. They use a "lightweight hypervisor". Xen uses a heavier one but requirers 
specially built guest kernels.
2. Their networking probably works better than vbox (have not tried it yet, 
however. Installing Win98 takes time. They have no vditool-like utilitiy.
3.  They say their "guest-additions" work in all Windows but not in Linux 
yet !!
4. They are NOT opensource and their personal-evaluation license is time 
limited to two weeks. Maybe they will figure out that the two-tiered business 
model pursued by Sun, Innotek and others makes sense. Few individual 
tinkerers will shell out $50 when they can play around for free with packages 
offering more tools and capabilities. An enterprize will want the support, 
slicker packages and utitilies, et al., but will strictly evaluate which one. 
Even holy vmware has a freebie.

_______________________________________________
vbox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users

Reply via email to