On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 12:00:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send vbox-users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of vbox-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: 3D acceleration questions (Daniel Spies) > 2. CPU load increase repidly when starting up the fifth guest > os. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:37:02 +0200 > From: Daniel Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [vbox-users] 3D acceleration questions > To: VirtualBox end user list <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >> Reading that page, Titans Quest is indeed supported: >> >> http://games.cedega.com/gamesdb/games/view.mhtml?game_id=4396 > > One star out of five is probably similar to: Nothing works except > installing. >
But it's meaningful if one PC shared by 4+ thin client. Each has his own OS. >> And about the anticheat programs, maybe as they're not games per se they >> aren't listed there. You could ask them about this or try it by your > self, >> I think there's a trial avaiable. >> >> And the difference between cedega and wine is that cedega implements a > full >> Direct3D and DirectSound 9 API, wine doesn't. As far as I kniow, most of >> the 3D support wine has is because of contributions of Transgaming, > stuff >> that is already in cedega and then backported to wine, which makes > cedega >> always more complete than wine, in 3D stuff that is. Also, Somewhere I > read >> sometime ago that Transgaming claims that cedega has the same > performance >> than in windows, but I havent used it to confirm that. > > Okay, I'll give it a try. I'll use CVS but they say the CVS is worse than > the > binary version. If Punkbuster and maybe Aequitas works it would be nice. > > Thanks for your answers! > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:36:39 -0400 > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [vbox-users] CPU load increase repidly when starting up the > fifth guest os. > To: Vbox users <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Dear All, > > It works happyly with four winxp guest os on linux feisty, AMD 4400+ > dual core, 2G RAM. Each of the guest os,with 64M RAM, consumes 1 to 5% cpu > when it's idle. But when the fifth guest starting up, near 100% cpu load. > Each guest consumes 20-30% cpu. > > I try the senarios: with ioapi on or off, with VT on of off, the result > is still the same. > > Is there any limitation for opensource version of VBOX? > > Thanks, > Fung > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > vbox-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users > > > End of vbox-users Digest, Vol 9, Issue 28 > ***************************************** _______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
