32-bit Windows is 32-bit windows. What difference could there be between Server 2003 and XP from an API POV?? Isn't 32-bit windows and 64-bit windows APIs supposedly backwards compatible between releases? (with some notable exceptions like Vista UAC and security utilities).
With several few exceptions (ie the change from VXDs to the minidriver model in the jump from 9x to NT/Win2k) the compatibility has been largely preserved. If Microsoft made Server 2003 unable to run common win32 software designed for XP then it'd be a downgrade rather than an enhancement. There are five (or more?) Vista flavours. Should VBox list all of them? "Does Vbox run on Vista Home Basic?" "Does VBox run on Vista Starter Ed.?" "Does Vbox run on Vista Ultimate?" "Does VBox run on Vista Home Premium?" "Does VBox run on Vista Home Business?" And why not including service packs too! "Does Vbox run on Vista Home Basic, service pack 1? because it isn't explicitely mentioned anywhere!" "Does VBox run on Vista Starter Ed. service pack 1? because it isn't explicitely mentioned anywhere!" "Does Vbox run on Vista Ultimate service pack 1? because it isn't explicitely mentioned anywhere!?" "Does VBox run on Vista Home Premium service pack 1? because it isn't explicitely mentioned anywhere!?" "Does VBox run on Vista Home Business service pack 1? because it isn't explicitely mentioned anywhere!?" Come on... if VBox says it works "on Windows XP onwards" then users shuold assume it works in whatever-the-h**** the OS-of-the-day from Redmondia is available, unless noted otherwise. FC _______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
