HI evey1. listen, i've created 2 vm's and ran. For eachone i used the same phisical adapter but different mac addresses (o' course), but the only one and the same interface name (eth1). The 2 ones worked great. So , i guess, all those stuffs about creating a bridge (br0) and then one and just one interface name (tap0, tap1, etc) for each vm.. is it now bullshit?
Regards! Matias,. 2009/6/22 Matías Adés <[email protected]> > thanks for the answers. i'll do it. > > Regards! > > 2009/6/22 Aleksey Ilyushin <[email protected]> > > Hi Matías, >> >> Right. Simply attach them all to the same physical (or logical if needed) >> interface on the host using 'bridged adapter' type. >> >> Cheers, >> Aleksey Ilyushin >> Sun Microsystems >> >> >> On Jun 19, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Matías Adés wrote: >> >> Hi eveyone I've another question for you, >>> >>> Listen up. If i had a host with multiple guests, suppouse 3, and i wanted >>> all of them to be connected as bridged network. When i configure each of the >>> VM's to run altogether, can i assign them the same phisical-logical network >>> card? and.. the same interface name? For instance: eth1 ? >>> I know in vbox 2.0 i had to create that bridge "br0" and the tap or vbox >>> interfaces for each vm i wanted to have connected to my bridged network. How >>> is it suppoused to work now? >>> >>> Thanks again! >>> >>> Best regards. >>> >>> -- >>> Matías D. Adés >>> _______________________________________________ >>> vbox-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users >>> >> >> > > > -- > Matías D. Adés > -- Matías D. Adés
_______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
