Ken Jones wrote:
> 
> Greg Cope wrote:
> >
> > Dear Ken
> >
> > I went along to check the vpopmail website (as I seem to have missed the
> > 4.6.1 annouce) and saw this:
> >
> > We have removed the vpopmail source code. We
> > appologize for this unfortunuate incident. Unfortuntately,
> > there are abusive people on the internet who hope to
> > restrict the free dismemination of open code. We appolize
> > for this inconvience. We can only suggest you contact the
> > adminstrators of efnet and dal.net.
> > No new revesions shall be released to the internet untill
> > abusive people are brought into the light.
> >
> > Can you shed some light ?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Greg Cope
> 
> I'm sorry.

No need to be.

> 
> The source code will be put back on the site within the next
> 24 hours. I apologize for the temporary lack of availablilty.
> 
> Unfortunatly, i was conversing with people on #efnet on the
> openbsd channel, and they insulted me deeply. I can not
> begin to describe how deeply I was offeneded. It was not
> one thing or another thing, just the small attitudes of
> a small group of people.

All I can say is forget it.  There are many people here (on this list)
that appreciate your efforts greatly.

It would be a great sham if you did not continue as producing great
software - and giving great support here.

I for one appreciate your efforts and hope you've cheared up.

Greg

> 
> I would suggested you joing irc.east.gblx.net and go to
> the #openbsd channel and say at least something.
> 
> The code will be put back up on the site soon. Better
> than ever. We are dedicated to providing open source
> software to the internet.
> 
> It's just, some times, I get really ticked off when
> stupid kids tell me how bad my code is. And I know
> they don't understand. Sorry.
> 
> If you really want to make a difference, do something
> to change something. I'm put the source back up in the
> next few days. It just makes me sad. It will be available.
> 
> If you really need it.. just email me and i"ll send you the
> latest version.
> 
> Ken Jones


Reply via email to