Sean C Truman wrote:
>
> Here is something interesting that might be of benefits. Directory hashing
> at the domain level for the ISP out there that handle 100,000+ domains.
Some Open Source folks at a German ISP came up with a solution. I'm not
sure where the code is. But we should be able to handle it. Using some
status file on where to put the next file. Perhaps using the .dir_control
code and the mysql dir_control table.
Ken
>
> Sean
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ben Beuchler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Vpopmail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 10:44 AM
> Subject: Re: large v. small site
>
> > On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:14:22AM -0500, Ken Jones wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm migrating to MySQL from cdb and I'm just curious if anyone has
> some
> > > > good numbers on when it makes sense to use the large v. small site
> > > > setup?
> > > >
> > > > We are an ISP and have around 6500 accounts in our primary domain. We
> > > > also have around 250 additional domains with generally less than 20
> > > > accounts per domain. I've been leaning toward small site, but I'm not
> > > > sure.
> > >
> > > Definitly use the default (small site). the large site option is
> > > really for people who have only 1 or 2 domains. It saves the database
> > > space of storeing the domain in each row.
> >
> > Makes sense. Thanks!
> >
> > Ben
> >
> > --
> > Ben Beuchler There is no spoon.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The Matrix
> >
