Hi,

At 07:29 21.06.01, you wrote:
>It is a shame that qmailadmin doesn't support this.

Well, I wouldn't call this a "shame". From my point of view, especially 
catch-all and postmaster accounts should be _working_, which can be best 
guaranteed if the server manages these accounts for itself instead of 
giving the authority away to another server, which is obviously another 
point for e-mails to fail.

Most of our customers have a small business, and they have a single dialup 
line and a bad e-mail address (@aol.com, @hotmail.com...). Especially these 
addresses are likely to fail or to be handled very slow. Why should the 
user rely on such services while he has the opportunity to use a fast and 
working server based on qmail/vpopmail?

Get me right, I don't say that it is bad to have the _possibility_ to have 
a catch-all forwarded to an external address. I just say that this is not 
as professional as letting the server manage all e-mail accounts itself.

Bye, Jonas


_____________________________________________________________
Jonas Pasche, RHCE                            Rheinstr. 3
webagentur Domke GmbH                         64283 Darmstadt
Systemadministration / Systementwicklung      Germany

Hotline: 0700 46637243 (24 Pf./Min.)  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telefax: +49 (0)6151 293173               http://www.domke.de
_____________________________________________________________

Reply via email to