root 1096 0.8 0.2 1336 348 ? S Jul10 15:40 supervise
qmail-imapd
You have a problem with your supervise supvervising imapd. It could be if
you have alread started the imapd outside supervise and hence supervise is
not able to start it (bind address already in use). If the run script exits
because of such reasons, supervise will keep on trying to execute the run
script and in the process consume CPU. To test this out just cd to the
directory i.e. /service/qmail-imapd
and execute ./run manually and see what happens
----- Original Message -----
From: "Miranda Gomez Miguel Angel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 1:04 AM
Subject: qmail and Hight CPU
> Im having a problem, my cpu looks pretty busy and i dont have many
> concurrent connections, this is the output of "ps aux"
>
> root 1081 0.0 0.2 1372 376 ? S Jul10 0:00 svscan
> root 1089 0.0 0.2 1336 348 ? S Jul10 0:00 supervise
> qmail-send
> root 1090 0.0 0.2 1336 348 ? S Jul10 0:00 supervise
log
> root 1092 0.0 0.2 1336 348 ? S Jul10 0:00 supervise
> qmail-smtpd
> root 1093 0.0 0.2 1336 348 ? S Jul10 0:00 supervise
log
> root 1094 0.0 0.2 1336 348 ? S Jul10 0:00 supervise
> qmail-pop3d
> root 1095 0.0 0.2 1336 348 ? S Jul10 0:00 supervise
log
> root 1096 0.8 0.2 1336 348 ? S Jul10 15:40 supervise
> qmail-imapd
> qmails 1098 0.0 0.3 1392 432 ? S Jul10 0:00 qmail-send
> <------------------------------------------------ WHAT IS THIS ??
> qmaild 1100 0.0 0.4 1408 516 ? S Jul10 0:00
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -P -R -l 0 -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 20
> qmaill 1103 0.0 0.3 1352 392 ? S Jul10 0:00
> /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail
> root 1104 0.0 0.2 1348 368 ? S Jul10 0:00
qmail-lspawn
> ./Maildir/
> qmailr 1105 0.0 0.2 1348 368 ? S Jul10 0:00
qmail-rspawn
> qmailq 1106 0.0 0.2 1340 376 ? S Jul10 0:00 qmail-clean
>
>
>
> there are 2 qmail-send proceses, one supervised and one alone. I did
> configure the qmail like LWQ, so there are a qmail script in init.d and
S***
> links in 12345 levels, i also have a qmail-send directory under
/service.Is
> this wrong ??
>
> look at the "sar" output screen
>
> 12:01:00 PM CPU %user %nice %system %idle
> 12:11:00 PM all 46.98 0.00 53.01 0.01
> 12:21:00 PM all 47.38 0.00 52.61 0.01
> 12:31:00 PM all 47.31 0.00 52.68 0.01
> 12:41:00 PM all 47.35 0.00 52.64 0.01
> 12:51:00 PM all 47.19 0.00 52.81 0.00
> 01:01:00 PM all 47.24 0.00 52.75 0.01
> 01:11:00 PM all 46.78 0.00 53.21 0.01
> 01:21:00 PM all 47.21 0.00 52.78 0.01
> Average: all 47.18 0.00 52.81 0.01
>
>
> Sorry for my english, thanks in advance
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
