Getting a weird duplicate message item for my postmaster (Catch all account)
in the following example the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account does not exist but
the sgardener account does. The postmaster gets two mails in his mailbox.
which have the only difference of the Delivered-To header as show below.
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Another Address" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<Shawn Gardener [EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<Lorne Kinne [EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Another Address" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<Shawn Gardener [EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<Lorne Kinne [EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
now my understanding is that the address should be formatted like this:
Cc: "Shawn Gardener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Lorne Kinne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
My maillog has only these entries showing that the "Friendly name" and email
are getting combined together:
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.210639 new msg 214706
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.211356 info msg 214706: bytes
864679 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 33863 uid 82
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.354899 starting delivery 23073: msg
214706 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.355964 status: local 1/10 remote
0/20
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.361772 starting delivery 23074: msg
214706 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.367570 status: local 2/10 remote
0/20
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.583437 delivery 23074: success:
POP_user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/domains/client.c
om/postmaster/did_0+0+1/
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.584072 status: local 1/10 remote
0/20
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.611352 delivery 23073: success:
POP_user_does_not_exist,_but_will_deliver_to_/home/vpopmail/domains/client.c
om/postmaster/did_0+0+1/
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.666260 status: local 0/10 remote
0/20
Jul 10 16:58:04 webmail qmail: 994805884.666987 end msg 214706
It looks like this is an issue with outlook express as outlook formats the
address properly and I do not get the duplicate issue. Has anyone else
experienced this? is there someway to workaround or patch this?
-Dave
